http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnews/20080925/ts_usnews/mccainandobamascrambletoshowleadershiponeconomy
The two contenders in the presidential campaign have been faced with a challenge that seems rather tricky. This financial crisis has proven to force McCain and Obama "to show leadership, judgment, and political cunning even while they try to gain an advantage in the race for the White House."
The political system in most countries are similar in a sense that they have a council to help the leaders to make decisions that might affect the entire nation's survivability. It is essential that the council, or the advisers of the leader, do not engage in groupthink. I believe that in a group, it is necessary for every member to play a part in the decision-making. Every member helps by providing an alternative point of view, or just simply lend support and commitment in the decision made. Even President Bush needed to invite "Democrat Obama and Republican McCain to join him and congressional leaders at the White House Thursday to negotiate a compromise and "safeguard the financial security of America.""
This is an example of how important a group is to an individual. As the solution might be risky, the group can provide many perspectives on the case and work towards the best possible solution. Many decisions need to be made, many opinions need to be considered, many problems need to be solved. With a group, the support is there to help boost the decision made and ensure that it will be the best. It is required of them to displace any form of individuality and stay united to the decision-making process. A group discussion allows a leader to make decisions, know that he/she has support and is not overlooking any flaws in the decisions made.